emailconfirmed
3,276
edits
Changes
→Balance of Spells
:::::::Seems my understanding of H is flawed (which really makes me wish we had proper definitions). But in any case, since everyone can see so clearly where a given spell lands, I think that in itself is adequate reason to conclude that it is valid spell information. And if the information exists, and we already have a place to show it, there is no reason not to display it. I fail to see how any counterarguments can exist besides, "I don't wanna!" --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 20:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
One major aspect of this is that ''all'' spells on this wiki would need balance points added. That's... a lotta work, and it's gonna mean a lot of incomplete articles. Given how reluctant folks were to even update legacy ratings for a while (and that was ''much'' less to do), I don't see this going anywhere fast. But at the same time, if people agree that spells need BPs, I'm happy to lead the way. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 20:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
