300
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:::::: That would be a huge shift, most of the existing userbase are homebrewers so we would need a lot of new blood willing to do all this shit. I am pretty sure each official campaign setting have their own wiki as well. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 13:35, 24 April 2017 (MDT)
:::::::I naturally like the idea, having been active a lot in the Canon section, and totally agree that something like Memory Alpha would be great to have for D&D! But as [[User:Leziad|Leziad]] said, that would need a lot of contributors, as there would be lots and lots of work. Most campaign settings have their own wiki, but some are quite small and stagnant or have a different outlook. An overview can be found [[Dungeons and Dragons Wiki:Canon Content Requirements#Other Wikis|here]]. - It may be outdated, but The Great Library of Greyhawk and Planescape Encyclopedia have been down for some time now, so what we could do here might be more rather than less. In any case, the basic framework would already be here as the Canon section. [[User:Daranios|Daranios]] ([[User talk:Daranios|talk]]) 11:35, 25 April 2017 (MDT) ::::::::I'm leaning against this idea. This is probably THE best site for homebrew I know and it's got some great creators, and most of the current users enjoy the homebrew. Plus encyclopedias of All Things D&D are out there. I'm not sure if I should link or mention any since our sister site is likely competing with them, but is restricted to just the SRD (d20Srd) but they're out there. I think being the go to homebrew site is a much better goal. - [[User:Aeturo|Aeturo]] ([[User talk:Aeturo|talk]]) 12:59, 25 April 2017 (MDT)
== Email issues ==