Talk:Nice Save (3.5e Flaw)

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Ratings[edit]

RatedOppose.png Ganteka Future opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
Now, automatic failure on a natural 1 for skill checks is certainly something for a flaw, but this adds in things that there aren't rules for, which is to say critically failing (which it tries to describe but fails to be helpful at) and degrees of failure and subjective worstness of failure. Also, why is this called "Nice Save" when this has to do with skills? Go elsewhere.

Not to criticize (no, really), but this flaw wouldn't change much in the games of many DMs. Mine for an example, hahaha... -HarrowedMind 13:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

In those campaigns, just up the risk by a lot. If you already use Caboose level failures in your games, someone with this flaw would start performing failures on the level of McCarthyism and American WWII response time, if not outright Carrot Top.--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 17:06, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Facts about "Nice Save (3.5e Flaw)"
OpposedGanteka Future +