Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luigifan18/Fläsräpper (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Ratings: in before requests for additional information get made and the ratings get blocked.) |
Undead Knave (talk | contribs) m (→Ratings) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{Rating |rater=Undead Knave | {{Rating |rater=Undead Knave | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
| − | |reason= | + | |reason=It has a bunch of abilities that don't really make sense with either the fluff or the base material, it has a few abilities that are just stupid (such as being able to kill Immortalists and Elder Evils), and it's way longer than anyone would ever read ever. Got the fluff wrong, too. I could go on, but I really don't care to. |
Also, why is it an axe? | Also, why is it an axe? | ||
Revision as of 07:27, 18 August 2013
Ratings
|
Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It too fucking long, also has obnoxious abilities. |
|
|
Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It has a bunch of abilities that don't really make sense with either the fluff or the base material, it has a few abilities that are just stupid (such as being able to kill Immortalists and Elder Evils), and it's way longer than anyone would ever read ever. Got the fluff wrong, too. I could go on, but I really don't care to.
Also, why is it an axe? |
Rating Comments
While I agree with tl;dr here, that's an extremely weak reason to argue for removing an article from nav instead of just disliking it on preference. Particularly for an artifact writeup, a category that has historically had a big pile of fluff and abilities and whatever else bolted on to it. You guys want to put actual reasons in your ratings perhaps? Leziad at least suggests that there are crap abilities here, but doesn't actually say what they are. - Tarkisflux Talk 07:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
