Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canin, Standard (3.5e Race)"
(Created page with "== Commentary == Just glanced at it, but a few things stood out. One was the formatting was a bit borked, easy enough fix but I see it. And then... oddities. They're anthr...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Mostly I'm puzzled why these things are so frail and explode at sounds higher than speaking. It seems very un-canine like. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 17:20, 21 February 2017 (MST) | Mostly I'm puzzled why these things are so frail and explode at sounds higher than speaking. It seems very un-canine like. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 17:20, 21 February 2017 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I'm not sure exactly what happened with the formatting. For some reason, it left a space where any subtype would go even though there isn't one. As for the -4 Con, I basically combined the medium and large breeds into Standard so that I wouldn't have to make the Giant breeds Huge size and the minus to Con is taking into account the health problems that the large breeds are sometimes known to suffer from. Maybe I should just bump the Giant breeds up to Huge and split the Standard breeds into Standard and Large. I don't really know about switching the attribute penalty over to Intelligence since many of the medium and large breeds are actually pretty smart. Maybe wisdom would work better since they can be a bit goofy. The sonic vulnerability is because dogs have extra sensitive hearing, but I guess that triple damage is probably too high. Maybe just an additional 50% or drop it entirely. I'll look into your Dangerous Allergy Flaw, if you don't mind that I use it. --[[Halloweenman33]](talk) 19:03, 21 February 2017 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 01:03, 22 February 2017
Commentary
Just glanced at it, but a few things stood out. One was the formatting was a bit borked, easy enough fix but I see it. And then... oddities. They're anthro dogs right? Why -4 Con? If anything you'd think they would be dumber but hardy. At the very least, dogs seem more hardy than elves.
Greater Sonic Vulnerability is a killer. Why so extreme? Actually, why is it there at all?
Lastly, consider Dangerous Allergy (3.5e Flaw) for your chocolate-bane. It may fit, and you can make it shorter by just linking to it.
Mostly I'm puzzled why these things are so frail and explode at sounds higher than speaking. It seems very un-canine like. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2017 (MST)
I'm not sure exactly what happened with the formatting. For some reason, it left a space where any subtype would go even though there isn't one. As for the -4 Con, I basically combined the medium and large breeds into Standard so that I wouldn't have to make the Giant breeds Huge size and the minus to Con is taking into account the health problems that the large breeds are sometimes known to suffer from. Maybe I should just bump the Giant breeds up to Huge and split the Standard breeds into Standard and Large. I don't really know about switching the attribute penalty over to Intelligence since many of the medium and large breeds are actually pretty smart. Maybe wisdom would work better since they can be a bit goofy. The sonic vulnerability is because dogs have extra sensitive hearing, but I guess that triple damage is probably too high. Maybe just an additional 50% or drop it entirely. I'll look into your Dangerous Allergy Flaw, if you don't mind that I use it. --Halloweenman33(talk) 19:03, 21 February 2017 (CST)
