Difference between revisions of "Canon talk:Deity"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I could expand this significantly, but I haven't felt that this site is interested in homebrew information. Is it safe to add homebrew content for running gods? [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:08, 18 January 2018 (MST) | I could expand this significantly, but I haven't felt that this site is interested in homebrew information. Is it safe to add homebrew content for running gods? [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:08, 18 January 2018 (MST) | ||
− | :The canon articles are restricted to information from D&D canon only (so the official D&D campaign settings like Forgotten Realms, Spelljammer, older stuff, etc.). [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] ([[User talk:Surgo|talk]]) 23:20, 18 January 2018 (MST) | + | :The canon articles are restricted to information from D&D canon only (so the official D&D campaign settings like Forgotten Realms, Spelljammer, older stuff, etc.). Homebrew content for running gods would go under the respective edition's homebrew pages. There are partial sourcebooks for it here, like [[Complete Epic (3.5e Sourcebook)]]. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] ([[User talk:Surgo|talk]]) 23:20, 18 January 2018 (MST) |
Revision as of 06:21, 19 January 2018
I could expand this significantly, but I haven't felt that this site is interested in homebrew information. Is it safe to add homebrew content for running gods? Cedric (talk) 22:08, 18 January 2018 (MST)
- The canon articles are restricted to information from D&D canon only (so the official D&D campaign settings like Forgotten Realms, Spelljammer, older stuff, etc.). Homebrew content for running gods would go under the respective edition's homebrew pages. There are partial sourcebooks for it here, like Complete Epic (3.5e Sourcebook). Surgo (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2018 (MST)