Difference between revisions of "Talk:Defiance (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Undead Knave (talk | contribs) (Roboboogie) |
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Beep Boop Not Commpyu-Tarr == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | ||
| + | |rating=neutral | ||
| + | |reason=Same problems as the defiant equipment, methinks. It doesn't have a range for foes, meaning you can sit in a cage of rats in the morning and effectively have a few hundred opponents each fight. Plus, carrying the cage of rats would be just as effective if there was a limited range. Plus, all the X, Y, and Z stuff feels like a problem for some of the players I know. | ||
| + | }}== Beep Boop Not Commpyu-Tarr == | ||
That's a lot of math that apparently can change every round. I know I'm not the only one who has raised concerns about the amount of math you're throwing out all over the place. The idea of this spell isn't bad, but the execution would be a real pain in the ass. --[[User:Undead Knave|Undead_Knave]] ([[User talk:Undead Knave|talk]]) 00:20, 22 May 2017 (MDT) | That's a lot of math that apparently can change every round. I know I'm not the only one who has raised concerns about the amount of math you're throwing out all over the place. The idea of this spell isn't bad, but the execution would be a real pain in the ass. --[[User:Undead Knave|Undead_Knave]] ([[User talk:Undead Knave|talk]]) 00:20, 22 May 2017 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :...You ''are'' literally the only person who has complained about the math. And it's [[Desolate, Lesser (3.5e Spell) | better than the spell that inspired it]]. I mean. Look at the talk page on that one. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :And then look at [[Talk:Chicken Scratch (3.5e Spell) | this talk page over here]], where the same person is rules-lawyer-ing a perfectly good spell. --[[User:Zhenra-Khal|Zhenra-Khal]] ([[User talk:Zhenra-Khal|talk]]) 18:34, 22 May 2017 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:50, 6 August 2019
Ratings[edit]
|
Ghostwheel is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Same problems as the defiant equipment, methinks. It doesn't have a range for foes, meaning you can sit in a cage of rats in the morning and effectively have a few hundred opponents each fight. Plus, carrying the cage of rats would be just as effective if there was a limited range. Plus, all the X, Y, and Z stuff feels like a problem for some of the players I know. |
Beep Boop Not Commpyu-Tarr
That's a lot of math that apparently can change every round. I know I'm not the only one who has raised concerns about the amount of math you're throwing out all over the place. The idea of this spell isn't bad, but the execution would be a real pain in the ass. --Undead_Knave (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2017 (MDT)
- ...You are literally the only person who has complained about the math. And it's better than the spell that inspired it. I mean. Look at the talk page on that one.
- And then look at this talk page over here, where the same person is rules-lawyer-ing a perfectly good spell. --Zhenra-Khal (talk) 18:34, 22 May 2017 (MDT)
