Difference between revisions of "Talk:A Player's Guide to Roles in the Party (3.5e Guide)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
Quantumboost (talk | contribs) (→Location) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: A few concerns with changing it to "others"; first, I don't want it to be miscellaneous and lost--I personally think that it's a good primer that virtually all newbies should read when they begin to understand party dynamics. Secondly, it has everything to do with optimization--it might not be a build, but it certainly belongs on the optimization page. I could see creating a new category called "CharOp Guides" or somesuch (I could also put the basic combat rogue guide there), but until something else is done, I don't want it removed from the charop page on the wiki. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 23:12, May 3, 2010 (UTC) | :: A few concerns with changing it to "others"; first, I don't want it to be miscellaneous and lost--I personally think that it's a good primer that virtually all newbies should read when they begin to understand party dynamics. Secondly, it has everything to do with optimization--it might not be a build, but it certainly belongs on the optimization page. I could see creating a new category called "CharOp Guides" or somesuch (I could also put the basic combat rogue guide there), but until something else is done, I don't want it removed from the charop page on the wiki. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 23:12, May 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: The thing is, there *isn't* a "CharOp" page on the Wiki. There's an Optimized Character Builds page, but this *isn't* one, no matter how optimization-related it is. I could see something like "articles" being added, or adding a list of links from the Optimized Character Builds page (and it being renamed "Character Optimization"), or having this moved to a user-page and linked to from somewhere else - hell, even the Main Page until an appropriate section is created. But it doesn't belong in "Category:Optimized Character Builds" any more than it belongs in "Category: Monster". | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I can understand not wanting a valuable resource for newbies to be invisible (albeit temporarily), but having it listed with the Optimized Character Builds is a back-asswards way of preventing that. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 23:23, May 3, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:23, 3 May 2010
Location
This isn't actually an optimized character build, what with not being a character build in the first place -- and it seems to be messing with the OCB navigation page. Is there a better location for this? --Quantumboost 20:46, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Other might work better. I'll wait for ghosts 2cp before I move it though. - TarkisFlux 21:46, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
- A few concerns with changing it to "others"; first, I don't want it to be miscellaneous and lost--I personally think that it's a good primer that virtually all newbies should read when they begin to understand party dynamics. Secondly, it has everything to do with optimization--it might not be a build, but it certainly belongs on the optimization page. I could see creating a new category called "CharOp Guides" or somesuch (I could also put the basic combat rogue guide there), but until something else is done, I don't want it removed from the charop page on the wiki. --Ghostwheel 23:12, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
- The thing is, there *isn't* a "CharOp" page on the Wiki. There's an Optimized Character Builds page, but this *isn't* one, no matter how optimization-related it is. I could see something like "articles" being added, or adding a list of links from the Optimized Character Builds page (and it being renamed "Character Optimization"), or having this moved to a user-page and linked to from somewhere else - hell, even the Main Page until an appropriate section is created. But it doesn't belong in "Category:Optimized Character Builds" any more than it belongs in "Category: Monster".
- I can understand not wanting a valuable resource for newbies to be invisible (albeit temporarily), but having it listed with the Optimized Character Builds is a back-asswards way of preventing that. --Quantumboost 23:23, May 3, 2010 (UTC)