Difference between revisions of "Talk:Goad (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
(→Activation) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::: Complete Adventurer and Races of Stone, actually. And it sucked. Taunting and goading has been around so long that its idea doesn't really originate from anywhere. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 04:52, June 16, 2010 (UTC) | ::: Complete Adventurer and Races of Stone, actually. And it sucked. Taunting and goading has been around so long that its idea doesn't really originate from anywhere. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 04:52, June 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: I just role play taunting. Sometimes a bluff roll is called, but I think that is all taunting should be at most.--[[User:Teh Storm|Teh Storm]] 05:32, June 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:32, 16 June 2010
Activation
Any chance of having goad become part of the attack option? If so, it'd be a good pair with intimidating strike. Havvy 03:56, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, don't want it to be used with whirlwind/TWF/other stuff that gives extra attacks. Just use it as a swift action after making your attack. --Ghostwheel 03:58, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I think they had a feat like this in Complete Warrior or Scoundrel. One of them two. Either way, is this a rewrite of the feat the Wizards made, or just a cool idea you had?--Teh Storm 04:42, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Complete Adventurer and Races of Stone, actually. And it sucked. Taunting and goading has been around so long that its idea doesn't really originate from anywhere. --Ghostwheel 04:52, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I just role play taunting. Sometimes a bluff roll is called, but I think that is all taunting should be at most.--Teh Storm 05:32, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
