Talk:Goad (3.5e Feat)
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ratings[edit]
|
Leziad favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Solid high option for tanks and slippery rogue. I saw it used with great effect without it feeling overpowered.
I also appreciate that it smooth and short. The flow of the game is a big concern for me lately. |
Activation
Any chance of having goad become part of the attack option? If so, it'd be a good pair with intimidating strike. Havvy 03:56, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, don't want it to be used with whirlwind/TWF/other stuff that gives extra attacks. Just use it as a swift action after making your attack. --Ghostwheel 03:58, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I think they had a feat like this in Complete Warrior or Scoundrel. One of them two. Either way, is this a rewrite of the feat the Wizards made, or just a cool idea you had?--Teh Storm 04:42, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Complete Adventurer and Races of Stone, actually. And it sucked. Taunting and goading has been around so long that its idea doesn't really originate from anywhere. --Ghostwheel 04:52, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I just role play taunting. Sometimes a bluff roll is called, but I think that is all taunting should be at most.--Teh Storm 05:32, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's play style, not to mention the fluff part of the feat. The meat is the numbers. Saying you use RP instead of dice rolling for X mechanic has no helpful effect in the game. It could be called "Inconveniencing Attention Getter" and still work the same way. Havvy 05:45, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
