Difference between revisions of "Talk:Law (3.5e Cleric Domain)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Another more unique but probably tricky idea would be to deal damage (something small like 1 per caster level) to anyone who successfully saves against a compulsion spell. Could call it Corporal Punishment or something similar. Admittedly, making it a compulsion limits the number of effects here to command and greater command, but still. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] 06:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | :Another more unique but probably tricky idea would be to deal damage (something small like 1 per caster level) to anyone who successfully saves against a compulsion spell. Could call it Corporal Punishment or something similar. Admittedly, making it a compulsion limits the number of effects here to command and greater command, but still. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] 06:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I like Cid's idea more, although this would bias the domain for low-level use more than high-level use. I'm not sure if this is a problem or not, though. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 06:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:33, 18 December 2011
Domain Power Suggestion
What about permanent align weapon / natural weapon / energy damage (law)? If that's suitable, could also be done for the other alignment domain powers. - Tarkisflux Talk 05:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Another more unique but probably tricky idea would be to deal damage (something small like 1 per caster level) to anyone who successfully saves against a compulsion spell. Could call it Corporal Punishment or something similar. Admittedly, making it a compulsion limits the number of effects here to command and greater command, but still. - TG Cid 06:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I like Cid's idea more, although this would bias the domain for low-level use more than high-level use. I'm not sure if this is a problem or not, though. - MisterSinister 06:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
