Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holy Knight (3.5e Prestige Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Author's Note) |
(added a comment) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Hard to do without the invocations list. Is that still a part of the class? How come they got pulled anyway? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 18:33, December 19, 2009 (UTC) | ::Hard to do without the invocations list. Is that still a part of the class? How come they got pulled anyway? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 18:33, December 19, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Perhaps a ''Silent Knight'' class is in order as a companion. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] 19:08, December 19, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 19 December 2009
Author's Note
This class started as very much an idea dump, just writing down everything I could think of that would be cool for the class. The immediate response was that it was massively overpowered - which was obvious, because I was including everything. I've scaled it back quite dramatically, but no one has reviewed it since. Any reviews would be very appreciated.
DragoonWraith † 14:39, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Ugh... I'd been planning on updating my version of the Holy Knight and now you've stolen the name! Curse you DragoonWraith, curse you! *shakes fist angrily* -- Jota 15:27, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Hard to do without the invocations list. Is that still a part of the class? How come they got pulled anyway? - TarkisFlux 18:33, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps a Silent Knight class is in order as a companion. --Ganteka Future 19:08, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
