Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jumping Dodge (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
(→Ratings) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
|reason=A straight up bonus to AC that easily breaks the RNG. Bad for the system, balanced too low at High, and does nothing interesting. | |reason=A straight up bonus to AC that easily breaks the RNG. Bad for the system, balanced too low at High, and does nothing interesting. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Renshae | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=Big huge AC bonus for very little investment. A bonus this big that stacks with everything else throws off the game balance BIG time. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:22, 27 July 2023
Balmz (3.5e Feat)
Yet got a typo there in the feat name below. I don't think this feat is "Balmz". :3
That said this is a very dangerous feat, it shouldn't be uncapped like this, especially with an AC bonus type especially designed to stack. As Ghostwheel would say, +11 AC at any level (19th in this case) is way off the RNGs and whatnot. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2018 (MDT)
Ratings
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| So yeah, big dodge for little effort. Cap dat. |
|
|
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A straight up bonus to AC that easily breaks the RNG. Bad for the system, balanced too low at High, and does nothing interesting. |
|
|
Renshae opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Big huge AC bonus for very little investment. A bonus this big that stacks with everything else throws off the game balance BIG time. |
