User talk:DraconicMan/Counterspell (3.5e Spell)
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
< User talk:DraconicMan
Revision as of 04:36, 21 September 2014 by Eiji-kun (talk | contribs) (Eiji-kun moved page Talk:Counterspell (3.5e Spell) to User talk:DraconicMan/Counterspell (3.5e Spell) without leaving a redirect)
Ratings[edit]
|
Fluffykittens opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| We already have plenty of decent counterspell/spell steal abilities that have actual targets and durations. |
|
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| As Ganteka said, even if the formatting is corrected the idea is bad, at the very least 1st level. |
|
|
Ganteka Future opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| There's not a spell level this would even make sense at. It's just not a workable idea in this form without enough of an overhaul that you should just start over. Also, parts of it straight-up don't make sense making it unusable just for that. First order of business, steal permanency, because Universal (Divine). Don't tell me I can't. I want to ruin this campaign on the first session! Snarl! |
|
|
Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A level 1 spell that can grant any spell as an SLA at will permanently is not okay. |
Sense not made... winter cleaning? --Ghostwheel (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
