Talk:Defiant (3.5e Equipment)

I Know I Just Commented, But...

This is even more bookkeeping than the spell it uses. Not only do you have to figure out what X, Y, and Z are each round, you have to decide which option you want up, as well, so let's hope that your party likes increasing the time it takes for you to take your turn by a minute every turn. </snark> --Undead_Knave (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2017 (MDT)

If you can find a better way to do it without ridding it of its functionality, by all means, enlighten me. Rather than range, I'd just considered the number of allies and enemies in that encounter period, so that the numbers are fixed per-encounter until a monster or PC is slain.

As for the snark I've received due to the math I'm "throwing all over the place", there was only one other instance in which that's been raised, and that was addressed. Furthermore... The entirety of this game is either math or roleplaying. Nobody likes calculating how much damage their Empowered Fireball just did to that monster than only takes half damage from Fire, but stuff like this exists all over the game. It's up to the individual DM to decide whether or not to use it. So while I can agree on simplifying it, insinuating that I purposefully or carelessly create math-intensive articles is not only incorrect but rather rude, especially when you aren't doing so in a positive manner. Criticism without suggestion for improvement is little more than vague complaining. I mean no rudeness by this, but if you're not going to attempt to improve the situation, why become involved at all? --Zhenra-Khal (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2017 (MDT)