Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hidden Manifestation (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
DanielDraco (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=DanielDraco | ||
| + | |rating=neutral | ||
| + | |reason=Little redundant with the default concentration check, but it's a decent backup safeguard for low levels. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
|rating=neutral | |rating=neutral | ||
Latest revision as of 07:25, 18 May 2013
Ratings[edit]
|
DanielDraco is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Little redundant with the default concentration check, but it's a decent backup safeguard for low levels. |
|
|
Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| You should not put variant rules into the Normal section of a feat.
It's a pretty sane variant rule, though. Psionic's lack of relevant visible details was a bit overkill. |
Display
isn't normally a dc 15 concentration check to hide a powers display? why a feat to let the opponent have a fighting chance? --NameViolation 04:02, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
- 15+Power Level, I think; I've always found hiding displays kinda cheap, so rather than giving PCs the ability to (virtually) automatically deny enemies the chance to see them manifesting (HINT: and to stop NPCs from automatically targetting PCs with similar powers without any knowledge of where it's coming from), I made this option so that PCs can still manifest without displays if it's worth it to them. --Ghostwheel 16:58, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
