Difference between revisions of "Talk:Smite Ruler and Transfer Loyalty of Populace (3.5e Spell)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added a comment)
 
(research answers all problems)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Any chance on going with a shorter name like ''coup d'etat'' or ''smiting usurpation''? Also, ruler really needs to be defined here, because if really what it does is allow someone to assume command of followers via killing their master, that could mean lots of cohorts. That's not necessarily bad, the text should just be clear about it is all. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] 05:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 
Any chance on going with a shorter name like ''coup d'etat'' or ''smiting usurpation''? Also, ruler really needs to be defined here, because if really what it does is allow someone to assume command of followers via killing their master, that could mean lots of cohorts. That's not necessarily bad, the text should just be clear about it is all. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] 05:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Research into this name reveals that it is Ideasmith's reason for making this spell, and it appears to come from [http://pw1.netcom.com/~shagbert/pages/munchkins.html "Munchkins cast Smite Ruler and Transfer Loyalty of Populace"]. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] 06:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:08, 28 January 2012

That Name and Other Things

Any chance on going with a shorter name like coup d'etat or smiting usurpation? Also, ruler really needs to be defined here, because if really what it does is allow someone to assume command of followers via killing their master, that could mean lots of cohorts. That's not necessarily bad, the text should just be clear about it is all. --Ganteka Future 05:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Research into this name reveals that it is Ideasmith's reason for making this spell, and it appears to come from "Munchkins cast Smite Ruler and Transfer Loyalty of Populace". --Foxwarrior 06:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)