Talk:Bangaa (3.5e Race)
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ratings[edit]
|
DanielDraco is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I'm not sure what older version I was reading before, but this is not a great race. I mean, it's not bad to play. It's just boring. Mechanically, and conceptually. It's not bad, but it's not good either. |
|
|
Ganteka Future is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Good-enough article. Mechanics are straightforward, but solid. Nothing jumps out as "I wanna play this", and really, I think the whole article is reminiscent of that. The flavor is just a bit unmemorable. I just wish there were more of it. There has gotta be source material out there to play off of and build upon. A passable grade, but not by much. |
Edit: The following commenter feels the race should also be rated "Good"."
It's really not a bad race in any way. You've kept things interesting without over-flavoring things, which is very nice. However, the stats seem to me a bit cluttered (for instance, being wiser than people think really would justify not giving it a -2. +2 seems a little unusual. Furthermore, as I assume you're basing this off of FFTA or FFTA2, the physical strength aspect could possibly be more noticeable. Well, that's all for now. --98.234.114.175 23:15, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
