Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monstrous Hand (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
Line 1: Line 1:
What if you have only one appendage capable of holding stuff? [[User:The Dire Reverend|The Dire Reverend]] 06:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
+
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel
 +
|rating=like
 +
|reason=Good way to give monstrous races without natural hands the ability to use weapons and the like.
 +
}}What if you have only one appendage capable of holding stuff? [[User:The Dire Reverend|The Dire Reverend]] 06:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  
 
:I imagine you'd only have one hand then.  Though I wonder what it is, since most beings have limbs in pairs. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 06:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 
:I imagine you'd only have one hand then.  Though I wonder what it is, since most beings have limbs in pairs. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 06:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:48, 26 September 2012

Ratings

RatedLike.png Ghostwheel likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
Good way to give monstrous races without natural hands the ability to use weapons and the like.

What if you have only one appendage capable of holding stuff? The Dire Reverend 06:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

I imagine you'd only have one hand then. Though I wonder what it is, since most beings have limbs in pairs. -- Eiji-kun 06:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Since it can be any two limbs, and this feat takes care of the rest, it would have to be a creature with only one limb total. Sentient pogo stick? Snake. --Foxwarrior 07:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
I was thinking a snake. It could only really carry stuff with it's tail, in my opinion. The Dire Reverend 08:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
But then again...

TWFSnake.jpg

Sssss.... -- Eiji-kun 09:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)