Talk:Psionic Concentration (3.5e Power)

Ratings

	DanielDraco is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
	I have no real issue with or praise for this.

	Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	This is just Enhance Spellcasting from SpC for psionics (and I like Enhance Spellcasting). I think the others are too hard on it. Yes, it's just simple numbers, but it does what it set out to do well, and fills the trope of powering up for a super attack well.

Well, I don't. Also, powering up for a super attack isn't properly trope-tastic without an element of "Oh no! He's powering up for a super attack! Stop him before it's too late!" to it. --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

It simply fair retribution, psionic thing is that they can nova most powers, yet they lacked the best nova enablers. So I gave them a nova enabler that spellcasters had since forever. --Leziad (talk) 04:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Wait... your justification for this is that psionic characters need to be better at nova-ing? --Foxwarrior (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

They lack many useful tools in VH games. Spell enhancer was one of such tool. --Leziad (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

	Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	What Foxy said.

	Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	I find this particular type of numeric shenanigans really annoying.