Talk:Aberration Hunter (3.5e Cleric Domain)

Ratings

ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.

I'm not really a huge fan of making a domain as specific as Aberration Hunter. It would probably be way cooler and more rewarding to make the domain a broader take on the same theme (say, Xenophobia, but even that seems like a bit of a stretch) and then making homebrew spells that are perhaps more variable. Aberration Bane Sword, for example, doesn't seem worth a 7 to me, nor does horrid wilting an 8.

Um, sorry to say this but the name needs to be changed, the name aberration hunter doesn't sound very domain-like and although it would be a passable name for a domain that only granted turn/destroy undead the fact that it grants rebuke/command to evil characters is a bad idea. Why? Because when I read that the aberration hunter uses aberrations in battle I immediately began thinking of a pokemon hunter, and that's not good.--ThirdEmperor 04:12, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Since when did your word became law? Honestly the name really doesn't matter so much as the content, which is solid. To expound, just because you think of Pokemon doesn't say anything about this, it says something about you. And your whole first thought is pretty much gibberish. -- Jota 04:42, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Wait what? ....though this domain has gotten a lot of changes since it's creation, since he uses "aberration hunter" as the name I assume all changes since then. Which confuses me... rebuke evil characters, what?

It's rebuke animals, turn aberrations. You destroy aberrations and promote the natural order. Come to think of it, where did you read half of what you said? -- Eiji Hyrule 05:50, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I didn't notice that it was turn/destroy aberration rebuke/command animals, now it makes sense. Sorry about the gibberish the wording kind of got away from me.---ThirdEmperor 07:01, October 2, 2009 (UTC)