Talk:Archaeopteryx (3.5e Monster)

Errata Style?

Why does this page look like it has errata in it? It's homebrew right? - TarkisFlux 17:47, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

...What is Errata?Halen2020 17:50, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

On the main article you have some skill numbers crossed out with new numbers written in next to them and highlighted. That's what we do when WotC publishes something and then issues a change for it later on (errata are those changes). So this looks like it was taken from somewhere else and then updated when the publisher issued a change, which is weird for a homebrew article. - TarkisFlux 17:54, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Bagawk! --Ganteka Future 18:07, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, you caught me. I was panicky and running out of time (I'm on timed computers at the library), and I was planning on fixing it later, but forgot. It's fixed now.Halen2020 18:12, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ratings

	Aarnott dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	A little bit weak for its CR and pretty boring. It isn't horrible, it is just missing some mojo to make it really shine. I don't see interesting encounters built out of this monster and the fluff is non-existent.

	Eiji-kun is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
	Dull but non-offensive. Could use some fluff text. For example, if I didn't know it was an ancient bird/dino thing I could really assume anything. A picture, a description, something...