Talk:Mighty Jaws (3.5e Feat)

Is there a reason for using non-standard sizes? Also Primary Natural attacks automatically use the same Strength and damage shown. It would be easier to say you gain a Natural Primary Bite Attack befitting a creature of your size. I also wonder why this is only for canines? Maybe rename the feat Improved Canin Bite? Xaiviar (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2017 (MST)

Since the Canin are basically anthropomorphic dogs, I divided them into different types based based on the sizes of real world dogs: Tiny (Toy), Small (Miniature), Medium (Standard), Large, and Huge (Giant), with Diminutive (Teacup) thrown in as well. Good idea on the wording. I'll fix that. I wrote it mainly for the Canin, but I could probably expand it to other animal-like humanoids (cat-folk, etc). I'll have to check to see if I posted it already or not, but I did write up a separate feat that I called Friend's Best Man (kind of dumb now that I think of it. Might need to rename it) that grants humanoids the ability to take this one. I didn't give the Canin a Bite Attack as a racial feature, so calling it Improved would be a bit of a misnomer. Halloweenman33 21:51, 23 February 2017 CST

With a pre-req like that, this should probably either just be a Racial type feat (so it's Canin only) or a Monstrous feat (which is for exactly what the pre-req currently specifies). The fighter type feat inclusion is weird but harmless.

Str 16 is a pretty intense investment. I don't see a particular point to it, but it is fine. Typically though you'll notice that feats that have ability pre-reqs usually make them odd (I suspect as a "reward" for the times you have a mid-way stat that isn't giving you another +1 modifier yet). So this should actually be Str 17, assuming you think it is worth to keep it at all. After all, one of the costs is "you burn one of your precious feat slots". -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2017 (MST)