User talk:Balmz/Thumb Ring (3.5e Equipment)
Ratings[edit]
![]() |
Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
Cool, something else super underpriced and overly powerful. Great. |
![]() |
Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
When the discussion just stop I get annoyed. So let me rate this.
Anyway taking all three options make it so much stronger and make no sense. While it extremely under-priced increasing the price will not solve any of it issues. Honestly a thumb ring is probably part of a masterwork bow already. |
Blocked![]() Rating |
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
|
Purpose and Execution[edit]
Okay, so it looks like in its current form, it ends up basically being the masterwork component for a bow, except cheaper and not attached. That doesn't work. Like, an aiming assistance tool could work, but you really gotta ask yourself, how expensive do you want this little mundane thing to be? Justifying several pounds of gold for the cost of a mundane ceramic ring certainly is silly, so if you don't mind having it be nearly useless, it can be cheap. It just doesn't (currently) have matching cost value and function value. --Ganteka Future (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2019 (MDT)
- This is definitely an improvement, but that doesn't mean it's actually good to go at this point. What this currently does is make any bow a masterwork bow for less than the cost of a masterwork bow. It does nothing for a masterwork or magic bow, which is potentially fine, but also there's no reason to buy a masterwork bow if you have one of these other than to have a magic bow. --Undead_Knave (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2019 (MDT)