Difference between revisions of "Talk:Clear the Room, Greater (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with "== Almost the same == Aren't Clear the Room, Improved (3.5e Feat) and this nearly identical? There just seem to be minor changes, barely enough to call it its own thing....") |
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Almost the same == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=Again, way too strong for High, should probably be Very High with this ability, also, as before Constitution rather than Fortitude. | ||
| + | |block=NewVersion | ||
| + | }}== Almost the same == | ||
Aren't [[Clear the Room, Improved (3.5e Feat)]] and this nearly identical? There just seem to be minor changes, barely enough to call it its own thing. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:33, 24 February 2017 (MST) | Aren't [[Clear the Room, Improved (3.5e Feat)]] and this nearly identical? There just seem to be minor changes, barely enough to call it its own thing. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:33, 24 February 2017 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Now that I think about it, the radius and lasting for a few rounds does seem pretty minor. It was a bit late when I wrote this so I guess I missed that. I'll see what I can come up with the justify its existence. --[[Halloweenman33]] 9:57, 24 February 2017 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I meant it to be Constitution. Fortitude was a typo, which I probably missed because it was pretty late when I was writing it. Thanks for pointing it out. [[Halloweenman33]] 19:15, 24 February 2017 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:28, 25 February 2017
Ratings[edit]
Blocked Rating |
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| |
Almost the same
Aren't Clear the Room, Improved (3.5e Feat) and this nearly identical? There just seem to be minor changes, barely enough to call it its own thing. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2017 (MST)
Now that I think about it, the radius and lasting for a few rounds does seem pretty minor. It was a bit late when I wrote this so I guess I missed that. I'll see what I can come up with the justify its existence. --Halloweenman33 9:57, 24 February 2017 (CST)
I meant it to be Constitution. Fortitude was a typo, which I probably missed because it was pretty late when I was writing it. Thanks for pointing it out. Halloweenman33 19:15, 24 February 2017 (CST)
