Difference between revisions of "User talk:Timplate/Abyssal Decent (3.5e Template)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Spanambula (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
m (Ganteka Future moved page Talk:Abyssal Decent (3.5e Template) to User talk:Timplate/Abyssal Decent (3.5e Template) without leaving a redirect: community opposed) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 00:17, 28 February 2015
Ratings[edit]
|
Spanambula opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Seriously, if you're not going to finish something, sandbox it. And if this is finished, then it's pretty bad. As others have said, it duplicates things already extant in the SRD and adds nothing new, no flavor, and no compelling reason any PC or DM would use this. |
|
|
Fluffykittens opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Unfinished rehash. |
|
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Is this even finished? |
|
|
Ganteka Future opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Decent: Adj 1. conforming to the recognized standard of propriety, good taste, modesty, etc., as in behavior or speech. Word choice aside, this is 4 HD, some boring features, some stuff that's wrong, and also the Fiendish template apparently. Just... no for PCs flat out, because your 4 levels will be better spent on class levels that let you do things. For monsters...there are already other templates that are more interesting and actually scale monsters a bit better than this attempts to do. This feels like an early, rough draft than a final published article. Sandbox it or delete it. |
It doesn't look like you're done yet, but
FYI, Outsider is a type, not a subtype.
Also your formatting is weird. I don't know if they are placeholders or not, but it looks unfinished. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 21:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
