Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ranged Threat (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Range: new section)
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
Why the fixed 25' here? It doesn't really match up to anything else, and the prerequisite ranged flank only works out to about half of this. So what's going on here? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  22:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 
Why the fixed 25' here? It doesn't really match up to anything else, and the prerequisite ranged flank only works out to about half of this. So what's going on here? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  22:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Mostly because it makes the edge of where you threatened (5' out in all directions) out to the maximum of your point blank shot area. That said, I've been iffy about it... think it should be longer? I'm not too sure about that, since combining this with Stand Still can make for a pretty terrifying combination. Alternatively, I could outright tie it into the range you can deal precision damage from (which is generally the same as Point Blank Shot range), in order to synergize with [[Precise_Marksman_(3.5e_Feat)|this feat]]. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 22:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:14, 11 October 2014

Ratings

RatedFavor.png DanielDraco favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Solid feat, well balanced. Possibly some small rules holes, but they shouldn't ever actually cause problems
RatedFavor.png Havvy favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Opens up the AoO to ranged fighting.
RatedFavor.png Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Ranged threats are hard to get, this does it well.
RatedFavor.png Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
The new format makes it stand out while providing a substantial ranged benefit. It was ok before, but now its both good and interesting.
RatedLike.png Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
Now this actually resembles how it should work, even. The range limit being so short is a little bit strange.
Blocked
RatedNeutral.png
Rating
Surgo is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
This rating refers to a substantially different version of the article, or concerns mentioned in it have already been addressed.
This is not a bad base at all. The issue I have is that movement provokes AoOs, and that can get a bit nuts. Even Tome Point Blank Shot specifically disallows AoOs on movement.

I remember discovering, to my dismay, that each movement action only provokes one AoO. --Foxwarrior (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Range

Why the fixed 25' here? It doesn't really match up to anything else, and the prerequisite ranged flank only works out to about half of this. So what's going on here? - Tarkisflux Talk 22:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Mostly because it makes the edge of where you threatened (5' out in all directions) out to the maximum of your point blank shot area. That said, I've been iffy about it... think it should be longer? I'm not too sure about that, since combining this with Stand Still can make for a pretty terrifying combination. Alternatively, I could outright tie it into the range you can deal precision damage from (which is generally the same as Point Blank Shot range), in order to synergize with this feat. --Ghostwheel (talk) 22:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
FavoredDanielDraco +, Havvy +, Eiji-kun + and Tarkisflux +
LikedFoxwarrior +
UncountedRatingSurgo +