Talk:Pyromaniac (3.5e Class)

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Revision as of 21:53, 1 December 2015 by Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) ([Fire] subtype: Link-fixing)
Jump to: navigation, search

Ratings

RatedFavor.png Luigifan18 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Burn, baby, burn!!! A fantastic fire-oriented class, and it's always nice to see invocations get more love. I like how you threw in that ability to burn water... I see I wasn't the first to come up with something like this.
RatedLike.png Gr7mm Bobb likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
Solid spin on a warlock styled class.
RatedLike.png Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
I really really like this class; it has very flavorsome powers, options, and the aggressive play-style. My only complaint is that it does not have the ability to fully pierce resistance until late level.


DM

I noticed you citing something called "DM" in the invocations list... what publication does that refer to? --Luigifan18 (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Dragon Magic. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I was able to find it. Thanks. --Luigifan18 (talk) 21:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Heat Death range

What's the range of Heat Death?

(Also, I'm trying to design class features for the Wind Mage. Do you have any good ideas for class features that would be equal in power to Heat Death and Phoenix Flame, but with an air-elemental flavoring and game effects that match said flavor? After all, spontaneous combustion and self-destruction would be rather out of place on an air specialist...) --Luigifan18 (talk) 00:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Added a range, good catch. Also, some summarizing. And.... not off hand, if I think of anything, I'll figure something out.
That said, I'm going to repeat what I said on the warlock and say you should make that an alternate class feature rather than adding them into my class. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 02:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

[Fire] subtype

It seems to me like the pyromaniac should gain the [Fire] subtype at level 10, 14, or 20. Which would work best? --Luigifan18 (talk) 16:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I really would like an answer to this question ASAP, as my Wind Mage class is basically this class's air-elemental counterpart, so I want to give it the [Air] subtype when this class gets the [Fire] subtype. --Luigifan18 (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
FavoredLuigifan18 +
LikedGr7mm Bobb + and Leziad +