Talk:Judge of Existence (3.5e Class)

Review

Ok, there's a few things to start off with. Manifesting/spellcasting classes have an inherent major/minor boost built in every time they acquire a new spell level. I don't know if the power list here is good or crap, because I don't do psionics, but if the powers are good then they get a major boost every even level. Otherwise, it's just a minor boost. But the fact that it's on even levels is weird. Aside from the Sorc, most full progression classes get new power/spell levels on every odd level, and wait until 3rd class level to get 2nd level powers. Yours is faster than the progression of everyone else, and that's probably not a good thing.

The other general thing to note is that saving throws do not increase at 1:1 rate with level, so setting ability DCs to do that means they are going to be really hard, if not basically impossible, to save against at higher level. It is much more common, and arguably fair, to start them at 10 (or 8 or 13), advance them at a rate of 1/2 level, and add an attribute modifier to the DC. The thing in electric force where you add their will save to the save DC on top of that is extra crazy.

OK, specifics.

1. Gravitational force is pretty awesome for a 1st level ability. It's potentially out of line for a 1st level character to use every round, all day. You could instead just make targets really heavy, so they treated all squares as difficult terrain and had basically halved moves. And then give this version, or a tweaked one, back as a higher level ability.
2. That said, gravitational force is also unclear on a few things. What action do you activate it with? Can you stack it with itself, and what happens if you do? Even if you can't stack it, how many can you have active at a time? You can't move creatures more than 100' away from other creatures that you are affecting, but you could target anyone within a mile that you can see, so can you target a bunch of people and try to bring them together? The higher level formulation is easier to understand, so why not have it affect all creatures in a 10' radius for 1d3+2 rounds or whatever, within medium range (100' + 10' / level) as a full-round action useable once per X minutes or encounter or whatever?
3. Force of insight bonuses are too big in general, and Greater force of insight giving a +6 reflex bonus is crap. You may just want to push the +3 reflex up there instead, but it's not really needed at all on a class with a good ref save. The skill bonuses could get by at half, which is still decent at that level.
4. Electric force is quite good damage, with a decent range. It's unclear what happens when you target someone with all 3 though, do they make 3 saves? This is a case where wording could be tweaked to make it clear. "Each bolt deals X damage to a target. A successful save against X deals half damage. The bolts may be fired at multiple targets or the same target." or whatever.
5. Force of Health doesn't have a limit on how many people you can target or a range. Can you heal all of your friends in the world 1/encounter?
6. Nuclear force is probably fine.
7. Force of death is nuts. You're giving out 2 castings of a good 5th level spell (normally obtained at level 9) at level 6, on top of an army creating spell twice a day and on top of their other manifesting abilities. It's an actual bad ability

I'm going to stop there, because it looks like more of the same with bigger numbers from this point on.

My advice would be to dump the manifesting entirely and rework the class abilities into at-will or per encounter/5 minute abilities. You already have a lot in there that going on, and it could be a perfectly good class without the manifesting. Heavy gravity or sideways gravity crowd control on top of bolts of lightning and nuclear flames and other bits is a bunch of decent stuff to work with. But if you really want the manifesting, tone down the class features. Manifesters already get a lot of cool tricks, they don't need a lot of really good class features on top of it. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 23:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

I have to disagree about save DCs that progress at a 1:1 ratio with class level. CR 20 monsters have Save DCs on their attacks that range from 25 to 35, and CR 1 monsters have DCs that range from 11 to 14, so 8 to 12 +class level would keep the DCs in line with existing DCs. Keep in mind, Tarkisflux, that with standard min-maxing, primary ability modifiers can frequently get up to or beyond +10. That said, 25+level or will save+level are both going to be too high. Making it scale according to class level instead of character level means that all their DCs rapidly become pitiful after level 10, or if they multiclass. --Foxwarrior 00:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Standardized powers to that of a Psion. Saves are now fixed to suggestion.

Specifics:

1 and 2, Gravitational Force: I will fix it to be more like greater ability. I could tone down Electric Force then swap their positions. Would this be more agreeable?

3: This ability is not a thing I find deeply interesting, nor highly important to the class. In fact that is the reason it is there, to teach me how to make weaker abilities. Therefore, 1) I have toned it down to the exact suggested scores (i.e. removed reflex from lesser cut skill bonuses in half; 2) and if the purpose is only for training then I wonder if the ability is out of place, and if it would make this class less confusing, more cohesive, enhance flavor and decrease power if it were to be removed.

4: Added some clarity to Electric Force

5: The intent was that one could not separate dice (i.e. 1d4+2 was the least and 3d4+6 was the most - due to it getting replaced at 8th level), therefore three creatures would be the max for the lesser and ten for the greater. If you can think of a clear way to express this, I will replace with.

6: Glad to know I am improving.

7: Removed slay living, can you think of a good replacement, or is animate dead powerful enough for its own feature?

That is an interesting idea, cutting all manifesting. What if I toned down the amount of powers, would that make it more balanced? I am indebted --Franken Kesey 00:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I attempted to post within 30sec after you commented Foxwarrior, give a few minutes to respond.

In my opinion, it's far more important for you to understand *why* Tark's saying the things he is, rather than just doing it because he's saying it. Be sure to understand and ASK QUESTIONS (most importantly WHY), so you know why, and thus make correct decisions in the future. --Ghostwheel 00:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Why is the Gravitational Force feature stronger than the Electric Force feature?

What separates a Partial manifesting class from a full manifesting class? --Franken Kesey 01:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

This is a partial manifesting class, and this is a full manifesting class. --Ghostwheel 01:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Fox - Fair enough. Getting 10 + Level isn't substantially different from getting 10 + Level/2 + Attrib Mod at the high ends. The progression curves will look different, and it will probably be easier to save against in the beginning when you don't get a static attrib mod boost to DC and they get one to saves, but meh.

FK - I think you misunderstood the save DCs I was suggesting before. The full formula would be 10 + half level + attrib mod, and that's it. Right now it looks like they get 10 + half level as the base for the ability, and then add class level and half an attrib mod on top of that. And that's a lot. You should probably go with X + Character Level instead of X + Class Level so that they remain useful after level 10. I'd also suggesting setting X to 12 or 13 for all abilities and dropping the half attrib modifier thing, since 12 or 13 is basically incorporating a minor attribute modifier in the base 10 at that point. But it should just be those 2 things, base 12/13 + Char Level, and nothing else.

Gravity isn't necessarily stronger than Elec, it was just strong for level 1. You used to be able to use it to push people off of buildings / into pits / into acid pools / etc. It was an extremely useful crowd control tool in many circumstances, and had basically no limiters on it. No action cost, no times per encounter / day restrictions, nothing. And while that's fine for a class to get, it's not necessarily a good thing at level 1 when most options are "hit it with a greatsword again" or "cast balance range appropriate spell and hope to make an impact in the encounter". Now it's a burst effect that just pulls guys in towards you, and keeps them coming for a few rounds. It's a tool that lets you literally pull enemies off of your allies, but not in a way that lets you do mean things to them without other setup. It's probably fine now, but I'm going to suggest a simplifying change anyway. Make it a swift or standard action (I'd be fine with it as a swift at rogue level since you don't have real offense at that level, but others may want it toned down if it's at will), and have it take effect immediately with no duration. Then you get the same initial draw without any weirdness about ground zero or what happens when you move. It should also just allow a regular save without the "grab on" qualifier; you can take no damage from a room full of fire with sufficient skill, I don't see why you'd need to grab something to dodge a force like this. Also, now that Gravity is a burst centered on you it should probably specify what happens when people run into each other, because they will be doing a lot of that. Do they fall prone in the same square? Do they pile up in your square? These sorts of interactions should be clarified.

While we're on that force, Greater Gravity should just get a regular save. The wording there is also unclear or confusing. Do you affect all targets within a 60' radius and move them towards a point up to 100' away? The reference to objective gravity is weird, since that could make you fall up at regular speed and you follow it with a specific speed limit. I don't know what falling up at 50' and down at all the feet (per falling rules) would do, but my guess is nothing. And if it does let you fly up into the air, it probably shouldn't last for minutes. That's a lot of combat time to have a target stuck in a space in the air with an ability that you can spam as often as you want. And it still needs an action cost. The only things I can think of to adjust the ability are somewhat far from the current design, but you could make it single target so you can slingshot people off the field (or use it to fly in a weird fashion).

Force of Healing - instead of saying they can share the dice, say they can split the dice up among however many targets they like, in 1d6+2 increments (or wahtever). With that limit in place a range is less necessary, but might still be nice.

A special call out goes to Force of Life. I don't much care that you're giving out 7th and 9th level spells as 1/day spell-like like that don't require costly material components (because of the spells you've chosen), but I do care that you're giving Rez out before the cleric gets Raise Dead. You may want to push it back a class level, and put something else in at level 8. Or split the abilities up, whatever, as long as you're not bringing back the dead before the cleric is. I'd also probably swap Revivify in for Rez, but if you don't want to reference additional books replacing with Raise Dead + no level loss would also be fine. The reason here is Rez lets you bring people back with no body and who have been dead an absurd length of time, and that doesn't seem fitting with the class to me. I could be wrong on the fitting though, in which case it's fine.

On nuclear force, after thinking about it those radii are kinda big. Not too big for the ability necessarily, but hard to use in a fight against anything less than a brigade big. Dropping 10/20 feet off of the radii, respectively, and allowing the caster to select the action radius of the effect (to a minimum of 10/20 feet radius respectively) might make them more useful.

And with all that said, I'd run this through a couple more edit passes. I can make out most of what you're getting at I think, but the tone seems wildly different in places and there are odd sentence breaks. That may be intentional, but I think you can get a non-standard cadence and style that is a bit more polished and easier to follow and still fits what you want. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 05:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your comment on the yatri spectre page, that major progressions should be on odd levels and minor on even, how much room would you afford me on that? Your idea of single target effects could be placed on 6th level (replacing the feat), yet could this be part of the gravity progression? Or should it be simply a separate ability?... Would it unbalance the other force abilities (chiefly electric and nuclear)?

Amended Healing

Amended Force of Life

Amended Nuclear Force

There are now collision mechanics for gravity, though the Greater ability still has a duration and the xyz can move. What are the pros and cons, from a DM’s point of view, of per encounter vs. per day? --Franken Kesey 07:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

→Reverted indentation to one colon

The major/minor thing is a guideline, not an absolute. I haven't even been looking at your stuff in terms of major/minor abilities, so it's not really jumping out as odd or anything. The goal of it is to keep people from overloading a class with too many abilities, and focus on ones that are useful.

The single target thing could fit into the gravity progression, or be it's own thing. It was just a suggestion, and I'm not even sure it was a good one. Adding it wouldn't unbalance any of the other forces, but would give a precedent for adding single target effects for them as well if you wanted. Not sure where they would go though...

Gravity is much clearer now, and the durations look reasonable. You may want to have Greater Gravity still require a standard action though, since it's such a big upgrade already. You could balance that by granting the lesser gravity as a swift action though (that doesn't stack with the greater). The fact that you can pull people up is still a bit weird though. Since it takes effect where you are, you have to be flying already to get any sort of upward lift. And it is still weird with the falling rules, which state that you fall the whole distance instantly. If you want to pull people up, it probably works better as an instant pull that drops people afterwards, like the lesser ability, or as an ability that holds people at the center for the duration after pulling them in (and pulls in new people who get too close as well). The hold version is a lot stronger though, and is probably not appropriate for an at-will rogue level class.

The addition of shaken to the gravity effects is also odd. Shaken is a [Fear] effect and seems out of place. Flat-footed, entangled, or even dazed or staggered might be more appropriate, but the latter 2 are probably too strong for an at-will AoE rogue level power. I'd vote flat myself (or cramped from the homebrew list), but you should look over the SRD condition list and homebrew condition list yourself.

Unless you really don't care what feat they take, or like inviting annoying technical discussions, you should qualify the bonus feat you're giving at 6. Even "bonus feat for which they meet the prerequisites" would be fine. You could also just reaplce it entirely, because bonus feats are boring IMO. You've got a reasonably good chassis already, so you could afford a utility or fluff ability here. An at-will mage hand by using gravity or soemthing might be nice (or even throw that in at 1, and upgrade its range and weight at 6).

From a DMs point of view, per encounter means you can expect the character to be able to do more stuff in the course of a day. They never run out of things in a day, even if they might run out of stuff in a fight (ex: every 4e character ever) and need a breather after. Per day means that there is a hard limit on the contributions of a character in any given day. If they have a really limited selection of abilities, you might not expect them to use one of their good abilities in a given fight. Or they might use a bunch of them because things were going badly, and then have to contribute much less to the rest of the encounters in the day. This limitation is often covered with per day abilities being stronger than per encounter abilities (which are themselves stronger than at-will abilities most of the time), which makes some people sad/annoyed. The combination of strong daily limited good abilities with little to fall back on leads to a phenomena referred to as "the 15 minute workday", where the daily guy shows up, uses all his big thigns, and goes home until tomorrow. I think it's wildly overstated and rarely happens in practice, but it's a concern for a lot of people. Encounter bypasses that entirely, but removes the ability to pull extra tricks out to save yourself in case things go south. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 21:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

2, 3 and 4: changed to entangled, added per day. Yes it would be a bit of a challenge, yet with some ingenuity or a cliff, it could be done. Reversing gravity has so many applications, many of which can greatly reverse the tide (much to the DM’s chagrin); therefore a few limits should be held.

6: Thank you for explaining. The focus abilities are now per encounter, all others per day.

Have added a set of features to 6th level. The power control object is the psionic equivalent to mage hand, that does not overshadow later gravity or focus abilities (as Telekinetic Force would).

I could not think of any other mechanical benefit that related to charging cells. Rage fills the gap, yet is a laceration from the other two focus abilities. --Franken Kesey 00:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

• What happens if you pull someone into the air with greater grav still isn't explained, and it should be. There are other rules in play here, specifically falling, and their interaction is not clear.
• If rage doesn't fit, cut it. It's not like you need it. More abilities does not necessarily make a better class, and bloat often makes a worse one.
• Throw... why does it even have a duration? How does that work? And the weight limit doesn't work at all. 120lbs when you get it is not something you could likely use in an encounter unless you were fighting small creatures.
• Is the manifestation thing for Throw, or its own thing? If it's not its own thing, why is it even there when none of the other abilities gets that writeup? Either they all should get something like that, either in that format or written into the description instead of on it's own line, or none of them should have it at all. And if it's its own thing, just a random fuzzy thing you can throw around, it seems like a wasted opportunity to give them an invis canceller.
• EMP blocking telepathy is interesting, but cancelling buffs is bizarre. Aside from being open to weird edge cases and arguments about what "is" a buff (for example, see your rage ability - is that a buff when applied unwillingly?), it doesn't specify whether it suppresses or dispels them, and yes, there is a significant difference. Look up Antimagic Field and Dispel Magic to see the difference. I would suggest instead that you focus on the telepathy thing, and have it affect telepathy and only [Mind-Affecting] spells instead of generic buffs. You can have it suppress or dispel as you like. The range should probably be higher as well, since it appears to be centered on you.
• I liked the Force of Life stuff, and will miss it. If you don't think it fits though, don't put it back in. And if you are going to put it back in, try to find a psi version of restoration to use instead of the spell version, just for consistency.
• Control object feels off to me, as you're running things like a puppet isntead of forcing it to or away from you. And as TK Force is single target, I can't see it ever overshadowing the multi-target AoE grav bursts. They apply in totally different circumstances and are used for completely different things.

Ok, those specifics out of the way, I think you're close to the point where you need to step back from individual powers and figure out how this class uses them. A collection of reasonable powers on a reasonable usage schedule on their own doesn't get you a finished class, it needs to be a semi-coherent whole as well. So if some class abilities don't fit, or you don't think that manifesting is really the feel you want, cut stuff and replace it. Spend some time getting the feel right. Here are some questions that might guide the process:

1. What does a typical fight look like for the class at level 2, 6, or 10 (or whatever levels you feel like looking at)?
2. What are they doing out of combat at those levels?
3. Are there any areas where they don't have relevant abilities that you wanted them to, or opponents they suck against that you didn't want them to?
4. Are there any places where they are useful that you didn't want them to be (like the old necromancy stuff), or opponents they are too good against for what you wanted?
5. Do they get enough uses of their abilities to meet your goals? Too many of some, not enough of others?

So aside from pulling, swapping, or replacing abilities, you might find that some of your per day powers should be per encounter instead, or even at-will. For reference, if you start wanting to give them 5+ per day, just make it an encounter and be done with it. Similarly, if you want to give them 3+ per encounter, just go at-will.

And you don't need to actually answer those questions here, they're just things I think you should start considering while it gets polished. I've spent enough time looking at it that I know what I'd do, but that doesn't seem relevant. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 04:39, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

What are your thoughts on the Turn or Rebuke features? Would you consider this class to be ready to be placed on main navigation page? Where we can still polish - but would be playable. --Franken Kesey 18:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Name

What would be a good name for this class? --Franken Kesey 18:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Try a cool-sounding name for once, not another name that sounds strange and which no-one knows the meaning of. Seriously. Physikineticist, The Strong Force (weak vs. strong forces, gravity etc), Kinetic Psychomanipulator, or something else. But srsly. That name sounds hella dumb. --Ghostwheel 06:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

What Ghostwheel means to say is that he hates Turkish, but likes English, especially those parts which resemble Latin or Greek. When choosing a name, consider your target audience: the names that are most popular are the ones that are clever manipulations of words and names the viewer knows, "references", as it were. Since nobody here other than you has any knowledge of Turkish or Sanskrit, using words from them as names just makes them sound like nonsense. --Foxwarrior 07:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Any problems with the new name? --Franken Kesey 15:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I find the name to be...ok, it could be better but it's like the difference between owning and driving an old car or owning and driving something much higher class, like a Porsche, Lamborghini or whatever. I was thinking something like "Principle" could work as the name, since principles are unchanging, or static, as in static electricity, as in an Electric Force. It also somewhat references your line "They decide what laws are to be broken." as a persons principles affect which laws they are willing to break, if any. But that's just me, I can have crazy different tastes to other people.--Stryker 01:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Balance Range

If you're giving it powers on top of all those class abilities it's probably wizard-level. --Ghostwheel 23:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

I am under the impression that most DMs prefer the rouge balance level (which translates to more people playing it), I consider it to be an important goal. Thus, 1) what would this class require to be a rouge level; 2) would demoting it destroy it’s amount of interest; and 3) could this be done without removing its dungeonering abilities? --Franken Kesey 01:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Regardless of what "most" DMs prefer, no balance point is any better than any other, and if a better balance range exists for a class, it should be reclassified as that. That said it's "rogue", not "rouge". For a start, I'd remove the psionics completely to make it rogue-level, since giving full powers gives too many options and abilities for many rogue-level characters. You already have decent healing and damage by level 3 even without psionics. Giving them psionics on top of all of that is too much. --Ghostwheel 01:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Powers

Would it remain partial manifesting if amount of powers known was increased by 1 per level, and powers points per day was decreased by two? --Franken Kesey 15:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Stick with what's been done so far to remain within conventions. And from a mechanical standpoint, no, 1 power is worth a lot more than 2 PP. --Ghostwheel 16:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

For future reference, how many is it worth? --Franken Kesey 17:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

That depends on how many power points you already have, which powers you already know, and which power you would get or lose. And, of course, its true value depends on what actually happens in the campaign in which it's used. --Foxwarrior 17:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

If power points gained from this class were cut in half, would an extra power known every other level be balanced? --Franken Kesey 19:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Scaling

Since the class is only 10 levels long, it has problem scaling higher. I shall make a few changes to the class, keep them if you like or revert if you want, and hopefully they'll help in that regard. --Ghostwheel 02:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah...

Don't give them metamorphosis or teleport. Neither really belong at rogue-level, and don't even fit the flavor of the class. --Ghostwheel 17:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

I'd argue against teleport being non-rogue, but it's moot here because it's a 5th level power and shouldn't happen in a 10 level partial manifester class in the first place. Combat teleportation, like DD or some other shifting, is definitely not wizard level and don't seem inappropriate to me. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 19:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I meant long-range plot-ignoring teleports. Obviously short-range combat teleports are fine, like the Dimensional Slide power, and I could definitely see that here instead. --Ghostwheel 19:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

I will remove teleport. I specifically did not want in combat teleporting powers, and thus removed them from original. Are there any issues with SRD:Astral Caravan?

What is wrong with metamorphosis? Metamorphosis changes the shape and physical abilities of a judge; noting that the judge main principle is changing matter…?

Turn or rebuke could be changed to a companion, yet I think turning allows for more types of uses, and is kinder on the DM. Also it has a first edition lesser ability (paladin), where as animal companion does not (familiars can only be used to distract in combat). --Franken Kesey 19:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Astral Caravan is also problematic--notice that it's a Nomad-only power, and freely taking discipline-list-only powers leaves a bad taste in my mouth. And the problem with Metamorphosis is that it is not rogue-level--if you want to keep it, start by changing the balance point to wizard-level. And turning is fine. --Ghostwheel 19:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Then I will also remove Astral Caravan. What makes SRD:Metamorphosis a wizard level power? --Franken Kesey 20:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Are there any unnecessary 1st level powers (there seems to be too many)? --Franken Kesey 20:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Anything that lets you dumpster-dive through monster manuals for things to Voltron together into some kind of broken combination which was never meant to exist in the first place is above wizard level. Even as a wizard-level supporter, I find any WotC implementation of polymorph to be insane.-MisterSinister 20:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Mimic is strange: it lets a microscopic Nature's Judge transform into a large bed without substantially altering its size. What does that even mean? Does its size category stay the same, despite being larger or smaller? Or can only Nature's Judges who normally occupy about 150 cubic feet use it? The former is nonsensical, and the latter only works for a very small subset of creatures (some horses, maybe?). Also, when its size and shape changes, do all of its stats stay the same? Can a Thri-Kreen bed attack with more swords than a Human bed can? --Foxwarrior 00:10, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Is Mimic better? --Franken Kesey 05:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Judgment Rating

Adding HD gained from this class makes the Judgment rating way to high, for the following reasons:

1. Greater Nuclear Force deals 15d12 (~97.5) damage at 10th level, at the same level: a rogue gains a +5d6 bonus to sneak attack (which is highly conditional); a psychic warrior highest damage dealing power, exhalation of the black dragon, deals 3d6 damage;
2. Greater Nuclear Force save DC, with an Int score of 25 (using Balanced Wealth - 15+2race+8), is 27; the save DC to negate a 4th level bard spell (assuming the same stats for Charisma) is 21; this is also the case for the psychic warrior.
3. If amount of powers known was linked to judgment rating they would gain five more powers known.
4. Turn or Rebuke Elementals: at 10th level judges can turn as a 12th level cleric or 15th level paladin.

• All examples assume a 10th level character with only levels in Judge of Existence

I understand it may be preferable for characters that have racial HD, thus may amend it to include only racial HD and other class levels. --Franken Kesey 20:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Minor note: we never consider sneak attack conditional at the rogue-level balance point. It is just assumed there is a way around the conditions (which there are many). That being said... It still is a bit over the top for damage. --Aarnott 20:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I just read the ability. It caps at your total HD. So your example is off. It would deal 10d12 (~65 damage) at 10th level. And don't compare to exhalation of the black dragon. Psywars do things like gain extra move actions with Hustle, and expend psionic focus twice to use greater psionic weapon with deep impact and a massive power attack (using leap attack + shock trooper) with a two-handed weapon. Think more like 2d6 (sword) + 4d6 (greater psionic weapon) + 28 (power attack) + 2 (weapon mod) + 10 (1.5x strength) ~= 61 damage. --Aarnott 20:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Mimic

Mimic would be extremely fun for players, yet I am not quite sure it still fits this class’s flavor. Is there a way to fix it to be more balanced?--Franken Kesey 23:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Rating

MisterSinister is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.

Don't get me wrong - were it written by anyone else, I would have ripped them a new asshole the size of New York State. However, I believe in positive reinforcement as well as aversion therapy, so I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to congratulate you on progressing from 'unreadable drivel' to 'badly-worded, overly-mathematical, non-concerned-with-non-combat-things design'. Given that this is a barrier many never overcome, the fact you've gotten this far is a positive step. At the same time, it's not enough. You need to consider if the complexity you've added, and the abilities this can use, are actually worth it. As it stands, I have absolutely no clue what the theme of this class is - nothing seems to gel or fit. Your writing still reads like an insane person wrote it, your design work is still shoddy, and your approach to the whole process still suffers from a lot of weird setbacks. Get past this, and I might actually like something you make. However, it won't be today, and it won't be this, at least not in its present form.

Theme and Amendments

First off, Thank you for taking the time and energy to look through this class. This class was initially meant as a training tool for making other classes (especially the dream ones I have been working on) – a way to learn the basics before creating rules and ideas. Therefore criticism is one of the mandates of this class.

Theme was one of the points you stated was lacking, therefore I have listed the reasoning behind each class feature (including powers) – such that we may discuss what works and does not here. The intended theme was to create a class that could manipulate matter and physical laws. Time, Teleportation and Attitudes (and most mental changes) are excluded from this, because it would be too much to encompass.

1. Gravitational/Electric/Nuclear Force abilities: Some of the more elementary laws of nature
2. Turn or Rebuke Elementals/Constructs: Sapient or non-sapient, energy is the life-blood of matter. Yet the more I think about it, the more I am inclined to remove constructs. One turning ability (especially on a common creature) seems like enough.
3. Mimic: Yes there is a great deal of math in this feature, perhaps it would be best if I removed it all from this feature; making saves and HP same as natural form, then had most the other scores static. The theme behind mimic: if one can change matter, can one not change one’s self into matter. I do not know of any classes or abilities that allow a player to become an item, let alone an item that is highly useful for when the party travels or a way to spy and ensnare the parties’ enemies.

Thank you again. The hope of this class is that it will train me to be better at creating articles. That I may begin to mature and become a better use to this community. --Franken Kesey 02:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

I question the point behind Mimic. With the power list, do you really need more utility? This class can heal, do reasonable damage, use powers for some extra utility, sneak with the ability to turn into a small item and at later levels become transportation for the party. Also turning into random objects reminds me of old cartoons where the trains/cars have eyes and talk to people, which seems at odds with the serious tone of the rest of the class. My other criticism, why have so many different "Forces"? By that I mean why bother separating your two main damage sources into different themes? For that matter why does the "Gravity" abilities have to be different, couldn't the Judge's control over matter and existence allow him to just move creatures? Basically if he's the JUDGE OF EXISTENCE why does he have so many specialized names for his abilities, would it not make more sense to just give one overriding name or theme for his different abilities (Principle of Potential, Principle of Energy and Principle of Matter as just some examples, these would be the names for Gravitational Force, Electric Force and Nuclear Force respectively).

Remember this is a world of dragons and giants. Nuclear force could easily be rewritten as "releasing the kinetic potential inside matter to cause explosive energy" and Electric force could rewritten as the judge creating semi-unstable shafts of potential energy, with the greater variant making the energy even more unstable resulting in the instability creating a small and incomplete implosion of surrounding matter (the lightning strikes caused in the 15'). All that said you've done a good job, this is quite the improvement over your old work. If I came off as angry in this post I apologize, I'm in a rather bad mood due to personal issues.--Stryker 04:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Removed mimic - due to the very idea of it being comical! I am speechless as to the ramifications if left unchecked.

(on mixing class features into one) In theory, yes, all laws are interrelated. From the standpoint of appearance: it is much easier on the eyes and mind to have separate abilities. I hear you, that both electric force and nuclear force have damage potential. The intent was that electric could be stacked, and was more selective, but could only effect a limited number of enemies; while nuclear could not be stacked, dealt more damage over a larger area, but also caused damage to allies. From a more flavorful standpoint: it would seem odd that only two out of the four natural forces was mentioned. I am not quite sure how gravitational force is any way similar to the above, mind explaining more? Also gravity moves whole zones, instead of one or two creatures. --Franken Kesey 13:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I meant what the Gravitational Force ability does, not Gravity itself. Your the Judge of Existence, will them to exist in a different place or something. Part of my confusion with this class, and why I think these things is that I see no flow to the end character, it's like a mass of different abilities granting power over different things (and to a casual viewer or someone who didn't pay much attention in Science class) that don't seem to have much of a connection to each other. Basically, why separate things into multiple different abilities, thereby making it that much harder to define the main flavor of the class (which seems to be a guy who Judges existence, thereby controlling it, yet he only controls a select few abilities, this doesn't mean add a shitload more abilities, the abilities you have are very reasonable) when you could slightly alter the flavor to make everything fit in a neat little package.P.S My main concern with Mimic wasn't it being comical, I was concerned about the utility it added and etc. (Though I can't shake the thought of a Judge transforming into a train with huge eyes saying to his party "Jump on board fellas! But don't step on my liver *audience laughter*")-Stryker 02:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Can you show me a rough sketch of what a damage dealing-healing-gravity changing-element controlling feature would look like? --Franken Kesey 04:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I can't draw to save my life. I can tell you what I assume it would look like though, a mostly transparent light blue fire, like how steam distorts your vision but imagine that in the shape of fire with a light blue tinge to the surroundings, as for what the "element" would be...I would say it's just the ability to control, distort, reshape and destroy existence (to a certain degree), so not really an element. Also don't think too highly of my opinion, I' not terribly active on this site, and I don't create much homebrew (I have a few things in the works, but other commitments stop me from investing time into them). I just like to give my two cents, as I believe every different perspective brings to light things other people didn't or can't see.--Stryker 01:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Needs more comments and ratings? --Franken Kesey 16:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)