Difference between revisions of "Talk:Psychic Strike (3.5e Power)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ranking with Level)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Ranking with Level==
 
==Ranking with Level==
 
Powers increase damage with augments not advancement in manifester level. Increasing without cost means a 17th level manifester get a +5d8 bonus to damage for only 1pp. Also, 10 pp for ability damage is significant, advise changing it to 6. Really like the idea, just needs some numbers fixed.--Franken Kesey 07:52, 1 May 2019 (MDT)
 
Powers increase damage with augments not advancement in manifester level. Increasing without cost means a 17th level manifester get a +5d8 bonus to damage for only 1pp. Also, 10 pp for ability damage is significant, advise changing it to 6. Really like the idea, just needs some numbers fixed.--Franken Kesey 07:52, 1 May 2019 (MDT)
 +
 +
:I am aware of that. This intentionally breaks those rules. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] ([[User talk:Surgo|talk]]) 08:11, 1 May 2019 (MDT)

Revision as of 14:11, 1 May 2019

Reverted

I rolled back an edit by an unknown IP making mechanical changes, I wasn't able to confirm it was Surgo and no notice was given. If this is in error, please reply here. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Not me. The IPs have gone mad, mad I say! Surgo (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm starting to protect the pages this particular IP keeps hitting. He's persistent, I'll give him that. I just wish he would stop to read the talk pages, or at least look further into why his stuff keeps being reverted. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Level

I'm thinking level 11 for the ability damage might be a little harsh. What does everyone think of moving it to level 9? Surgo (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2017 (MDT)

Ranking with Level

Powers increase damage with augments not advancement in manifester level. Increasing without cost means a 17th level manifester get a +5d8 bonus to damage for only 1pp. Also, 10 pp for ability damage is significant, advise changing it to 6. Really like the idea, just needs some numbers fixed.--Franken Kesey 07:52, 1 May 2019 (MDT)

I am aware of that. This intentionally breaks those rules. Surgo (talk) 08:11, 1 May 2019 (MDT)