Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rod of Arcane Fire (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Zhenra-Khal (talk | contribs) |
Undead Knave (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Clarificiation == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Undead Knave | ||
| + | |rating=dislike | ||
| + | |reason=A ring of minor energy resistance is a) a slotted item, b) gives energy resistance 10, and c) costs 12k. This gives energy resistance 10 as a slotless item as a secondary feature on an item that - without it - is probably properly priced. As is, if you got this at the earliest you could, you'd severely hamper most characters (or creatures) who frequently used typeless damage (such as warlocks or many other types of casters). | ||
| + | }}== Clarificiation == | ||
"Per spell slot consumed" or "per spell level of the slot consumed"? --[[User:Zhenra-Khal|Zhenra-Khal]] ([[User talk:Zhenra-Khal|talk]]) 14:46, 20 November 2017 (MST) | "Per spell slot consumed" or "per spell level of the slot consumed"? --[[User:Zhenra-Khal|Zhenra-Khal]] ([[User talk:Zhenra-Khal|talk]]) 14:46, 20 November 2017 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 18 July 2020
Ratings
|
Undead Knave dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A ring of minor energy resistance is a) a slotted item, b) gives energy resistance 10, and c) costs 12k. This gives energy resistance 10 as a slotless item as a secondary feature on an item that - without it - is probably properly priced. As is, if you got this at the earliest you could, you'd severely hamper most characters (or creatures) who frequently used typeless damage (such as warlocks or many other types of casters). |
Clarificiation
"Per spell slot consumed" or "per spell level of the slot consumed"? --Zhenra-Khal (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2017 (MST)
- That's what I figured; I just read it and had to ask because of the way it's worded. --Zhenra-Khal (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2017 (MST)
