Difference between revisions of "Talk:Primeval Dragons (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(→Sweet work) |
(→Sweet work) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Sweet work == | == Sweet work == | ||
| − | These are some sweet NPCs. I would add some text like "they are as old as the land itself and were here when time began. They remember the formations of all the major mountain chains and the gods and demons who created the upheavels. " As for appearance, I'd use a darker variant of each chromatic color, like "merlot red", "rust orange", "olive green", with each having a tinge of iridescence only at the edges of their scales where they curl under into the skin. I would do it myself, but the format of this wiki is rather constrained and makes my voicing in the text too different from the original author's.[[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 10:52, 30 December 2017 (MST) | + | These are some sweet NPCs. I would add some text like "they are as old as the land itself and were here when time began. They remember the formations of all the major mountain chains and the gods and demons who created the upheavels. " As for appearance, I'd use a darker variant of each chromatic color, like "merlot red", "rust orange", "olive green", "burnt purple" with each having a tinge of iridescence only at the edges of their scales where they curl under into the skin. I would do it myself, but the format of this wiki is rather constrained and makes my voicing in the text too different from the original author's.[[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 10:52, 30 December 2017 (MST) |
Revision as of 18:42, 30 December 2017
Ratings
|
Wildmage favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| moa dragons, and these are cool and thought throu |
|
|
Stryker favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| These make for very interesting NPCs and encounters, whether in addition to already existing true dragons or as a replacement. Also dragons that aren't defined by colors, so that's a major plus. |
|
|
Fluffykittens favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Very flavorful, and mechanically functional. Better than most of the dragons created by WOTC. |
|
|
Undead Knave favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| A dragon that actually has a reason for the way it looks, thinks, and acts? Inconceivable! |
|
|
Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| I've used the Lethus and Olympus dragons to great effect in my games. Personal stories aside, I do like new and interesting takes on dragons above and beyond the basic 10. |
|
|
Leziad favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| I like the idea of primeval dragons, they are more interesting than the color-coded DnD Dragon. Each individual dragon possess their own unique abilities and quirk which is imo good design. |
Sweet work
These are some sweet NPCs. I would add some text like "they are as old as the land itself and were here when time began. They remember the formations of all the major mountain chains and the gods and demons who created the upheavels. " As for appearance, I'd use a darker variant of each chromatic color, like "merlot red", "rust orange", "olive green", "burnt purple" with each having a tinge of iridescence only at the edges of their scales where they curl under into the skin. I would do it myself, but the format of this wiki is rather constrained and makes my voicing in the text too different from the original author's.Cedric (talk) 10:52, 30 December 2017 (MST)
